Chapter 5: Retailing
Policy S1: New Retail Development
Policy S2: Retail Warehouse Provision
Policy S3: Primary Shopping Frontage Zones
Policy S4: Secondary Shopping Frontage Zones
Policy S5: Local District Centres
Policy S7: Changes of Use of Shops to Non-Shop Uses
Strategic Policy
Local Context
POLICY S1
1. RETAIL DEVELOPMENT IS ACCEPTABLE WITHIN THE DEFINED TOWN CENTRE AREAS, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SHOPPING FRONTAGE ZONES AND LOCAL DISTRICT CENTRES AND WITHIN ANY OTHER SITES ALLOCATED FOR SUCH USE AND DEFINED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP. SUCH DEVELOPMENT MUST BE OF A SCALE, EXTENT AND CHARACTER THAT COMPLEMENTS THE RETAIL FUNCTION OF EXISTING CENTRES.
2. ANY RETAIL PROPOSALS OUTSIDE THESE AREAS WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED IF A DEMONSTRABLE NEED EXISTS FOR THE PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT WHICH SHOULD BE MET WITHIN THE DISTRICT AND WHICH CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE ABOVE PREFERRED AREAS. IN SUCH CASES, THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONAL PRIORITIES SHOULD BE OBSERVED:
a. SITES WITHIN THE DEFINED TOWN CENTRES OF HIGH WYCOMBE, MARLOW AND PRINCES RISBOROUGH; THEN,
b. WITHIN ADJACENT EDGE-OF- CENTRE LOCATIONS WHERE ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE WELL INTEGRATED WITH THE EXISTING CENTRE; AND THEN,
c. OUT-OF-CENTRE LOCATIONS WITHIN THE DEFINED URBAN EDGE OF HIGH WYCOMBE.
3. ALL RETAIL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS (OTHER THAN RURAL ENTERPRISES AND FARM SHOPS) WILL ONLY BE ACCEPTABLE WHERE THEY WOULD:
a. HAVE NO ADVERSE IMPACT UPON THE VITALITY AND VIABILITY OF THE ABOVE PREFERRED AREAS (IN APPROPRIATE CIRCUMSTANCES, PLANNING CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED ON CONSENTS IN ORDER TO CONTROL THE TYPE OF GOODS SOLD IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THIS); AND,
b. NOT RESULT IN THE EFFECTIVE LOSS OF RESIDENTIAL CAPACITY, AND,
c. NOT RESULT IN THE EFFECTIVE LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT CAPACITY; AND,
d. BE READILY ACCESSIBLE BY A FULL RANGE OF TRAVEL MODES AND WOULD MINIMISE THE NUMBER AND LENGTH OF PRIVATE CAR TRIPS.
POLICY S2
THE WYCOMBE MARSH SITE AS IDENTIFIED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP IS ALLOCATED FOR COMPREHENSIVE MIXED USE REDEVELOPMENT TO INCLUDE RETAIL WAREHOUSE PROVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH POLICIES S1, H2, H6 AND E6.
Back to Top
Primary Shopping Frontage Zones
POLICY S3
1. WITHIN THE PRIMARY SHOPPING FRONTAGE ZONES, AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, PLANNING PERMISSION FOR THE CHANGE OF USE (OF ANY PART OF THE PREMISES IN QUESTION) FROM A SHOP USE (USE CLASS A1) TO A NON-SHOP USE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. EXCEPTIONS TO THIS POLICY WILL BE:
a. WHERE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WOULD DEMONSTRABLY ASSIST IN THE CONTINUED PRESERVATION OR REHABILITATION OF A LISTED BUILDING WHICH MIGHT NOT OTHERWISE BE ACHIEVED; OR
b. WHERE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF VACANT ACCOMMODATION ABOVE SHOPS WOULD INVOLVE THE CREATION OF INDEPENDENTLY ACCESSIBLE RESIDENTIAL UNIT(S); OR
c. WHERE, IN HIGH WYCOMBE TOWN CENTRE, THE PROPOSAL IS FOR A USE WITHIN CLASS A3 OF THE USE CLASSES ORDER AND WHICH WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO ITS OVERALL ATTRACTIVENESS; AND WHICH WOULD NOT ADJOIN AN EXISTING (OR PROPOSED AND AUTHORISED) NON-SHOP USE OR CUMULATIVELY UNDERMINE THE EFFICIENCY OR CONTINUITY OF THE TOWN CENTRE’S RETAIL FUNCTION.
2. PERMISSIONS GRANTED FOR THE ABOVE CHANGES, AS EXCEPTIONS TO THE POLICY, MAY BE RESTRICTED TO THE PARTICULAR USE FOR WHICH THE APPLICATION WAS MADE, NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE USE CLASSES ORDER.
3. THE CHANGE OF USE OF AN EXISTING CLASS A2 OR A3 USE TO ONE WHICH IS OUTSIDE PARTS A OR C OF THE SCHEDULE TO THE TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING (USE CLASSES) ORDER WILL NOT BE PERMITTED.
POLICY S4
WITHIN THE SECONDARY SHOPPING FRONTAGE ZONES, AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, THE CHANGE OF USE (OF ANY PART OF THE PREMISES IN QUESTION) FROM A SHOP TO A USE WITHIN CLASSES A2 OR A3 OF THE SCHEDULE TO THE USE CLASSES ORDER OR THE CHANGE OF USE OF ANY SHOP UNIT WITHIN PART A TO ANY USE OUTSIDE PART A (INCLUDING PARTS C AND D) WILL BE ACCEPTABLE, PROVIDED THAT THE UNIT WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THE USE CHANGE DOES NOT ADJOIN AN EXISTING (OR PROPOSED AND AUTHORISED) NON- SHOP UNIT.
POLICY S5
1. DEVELOPMENT LIKELY TO HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE VITALITY, VIABILITY OR PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE LOCAL DISTRICT CENTRES (LISTED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP) WILL NOT BE PERMITTED:
a. DESBOROUGH ROAD NGR SU 859 932
b. BOURNE END SU 893 875
c. HAZLEMERE SU 893 962
d. WOOBURN GREEN SU 913 886
e. FLACKWELL HEATH SU 895 899
2. WHEN DETERMINING APPLICATIONS FOR CHANGES OF USE OF SHOPS TO NON-SHOP USES IN LOCAL DISTRICT CENTRES THE COUNCIL WILL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING:
a. THE DEGREE OF CUSTOMER ATTRACTION TO THE PROPOSED USE;
b. THE FORM OF THE RETAIL AREA AND THE EXISTING LEVEL OF NON- RETAIL ACTIVITIES; AND
c. THE SUITABILITY OF THE UNIT FOR SHOPPING IN RELATION TO ITS SIZE AND/OR SERVICING ARRANGEMENTS.
3. IN ALL CASES PERMISSION WILL NOT NORMALLY BE GRANTED FOR THE CHANGE OF USE OF A SHOP TO A NON-SHOP USE WHERE THE PREMISES IN QUESTION ADJOIN AN EXISTING OR PROPOSED NON-SHOP USE.
4. THE CHANGE OF USE OF A UNIT WITHIN PART A OF THE SCHEDULE TO THE USE CLASSES ORDER TO ANY USE OUTSIDE PART A WILL NOT NORMALLY BE PERMITTED.
POLICY S6
1. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS WILL BE EXPECTED TO SAFEGUARD THE PROVISION OF SHOPPING FACILITIES, WHICH MEET THE DAY TO DAY NEEDS OF LOCAL RESIDENTS.
2. IN DETERMINING APPLICATIONS FOR THE CHANGE OF USE OF SHOPS IN LOCAL SHOPPING PARADES TO NON- SHOP USES THE COUNCIL WILL HAVE REGARD TO THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:
a. THE NUMBER AND RANGE OF EXISTING RETAIL FACILITIES WITHIN THE AREA;
b. THE DEGREE OF CUSTOMER ATTRACTION TO THE PROPOSED USE;
c. THE SUITABILITY OF THE UNIT FOR SHOPPING IN RELATION TO ITS SIZE AND/OR SERVICING ARRANGEMENTS.
3. THESE FACTORS WILL ALSO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN ASSESSING THE CHANGE OF USE OF AN A2 OR A3 USE TO A USE OUTSIDE PART A OF THE SCHEDULE TO THE USE CLASSES ORDER 1987.
4. THE CHANGE OF USE OF SHOPS NOT IN A PARADE WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE LOCAL SHOPPING FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE IMMEDIATE LOCALITY.
POLICY S7
1. WHERE THE CHANGE OF USE OF A SHOP TO A NON-SHOP USE IS PERMITTED CONDITIONS WILL BE IMPOSED TO THE EFFECT THAT:
a. A SATISFACTORY WINDOW DISPLAY IS MAINTAINED; AND
b. THE CHANGE OF USE IS IMPLEMENTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS.
POLICY S8
1. PROPOSALS FOR NEW OR REPLACEMENT SHOP FRONTS OR ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING ONES WILL BE EXPECTED TO DISPLAY HIGH STANDARDS OF DESIGN THAT COMPLEMENT AND DO NOT DOMINATE THEIR SETTING. TO THIS END THEY SHOULD:
a. RESPECT THE SCALE, PROPORTIONS AND APPEARANCE OF THE UPPER PART OF THE STRUCTURE, IN PARTICULAR WITHOUT ENLARGING UPPER FLOOR WINDOWS FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES;
b. RESPECT THE SCALE AND OVERALL CHARACTER OF THE STREET SCENE AND ADJOINING SHOP FRONTS WHERE RELEVANT;
c. AVOID STRIDENT COLOURS, DEEP FASCIAS AND OVERLARGE LETTERING AND LOGOS; AND
d. IN RESPECT OF TRADITIONAL SHOP FRONTS WHERE THEY SURVIVE, RETAIN, REPAIR OR REINSTATE MISSING ELEMENTS AND REFURBISH THEM WITH PARTICULAR ATTENTION PAID TO FASCIA LINES, STALL RISER HEIGHTS, FRAME AND GLAZING BAR PROFILES, MATERIALS AND FINISHES;
e. WHERE A SECURITY SHUTTER IS PROPOSED USE EITHER LATTICE, LAMINATED GLASS OR REMOVABLE GRILLES, AND IN CONSERVATION AREAS ACCORD WITH POLICY HE15.